on 2/14/01 4:33 AM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, I have written a couple of applications using Turbine 2.0 ,
> and this has sparked off some enthusiasm among my fellow developers to use
> Turbine in other projects.
>
> I want them to have as smooth a ride as possible, because if they give it
> bad press, noone else in the company will bother using it in future.
> Although I know a lot about Turbine 2.0, I'm a bit out of touch with the
> current version.
There has never been a "release version" of Turbine, so I find it kind of
funny that you are saying that. :-)
> They mentioned Jrun to the customer, so they will probably have to use
> that, I think they will also be using MS SQLServer as the database.
> Is the current TDK stable on JRun, and does it run with SQLServer OK?
> If not how much work will be required to write the required classes?
The question is not how stable Turbine is with JRun, but how stable JRun is
period. JRun has had at least 3-4 major security holes in the last year.
> I noticed the security model is different now, but I presume it is
> essentially the same from a development point of view - AccessControlLists
> and similar?
Yes.
> Is Velocity ready for using in a live system, or should Webmacro be used?
> (Oh the joy of not having to write evrything in ECS - I can't wait :-))
Velocity is ready for use IMHO.
-jon
--
If you come from a Perl or PHP background, JSP is a way to take
your pain to new levels. --Anonymous
<http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/> && <http://java.apache.org/turbine/>
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
