On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 07:37:13PM -0600, Dave Bryson wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, you wrote:
> >
> > Ok.... I think thats it....... I you somebody interested. I would like to make a
> > contribution.
>
> I'm interested. Even if it does overlap with intake. There may be something
> that it can offer.
Don't get me wrong - I'm interested too, that's why I followed up to
Leandro's posts. I'm just really keen to try and keep away from the n
different ways of doing the same thing in Turbine issue. Not that that
is always wrong, it's not bad that we support multiple template engines
for example. But for instance the situation when both the OPaL code and
Peer system was around and it wasn't clear which a new developer should
look to pick up and use was unsatisfactory.
And I'm sure there is stuff that Leandro's code can offer, its just a
matter of integrating it into the solution that is there rather than
just adding it as is.
--
Sean Legassick
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Czlowiekiem jestem i nic co ludzkie nie jest mi obce
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
