on 2/21/01 4:09 AM, "Rafal Krzewski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think that instead of having pool.jar we could have turbine-core.jar
> that contained code available both in servlets and in standalone
> applications...
>
> Rafal
I would be open to that.
However, I STILL don't understand why we need to break things up like that.
turbine.jar is a ~500k file and Java only loads the class files it needs to
use out of the .jar file during runtime. Big deal.
thanks,
-jon
--
If you come from a Perl or PHP background, JSP is a way to take
your pain to new levels. --Anonymous
<http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/> && <http://java.apache.org/turbine/>
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
