Hi Andy, (Google groups seems not to working correctly today, so 'm also ending you this in private)
Andy schrieb: > Given how out of date some of these remaining docs are, is it still > worth the time to port them? Can they be marked "out of date/don't > care" before bothering to port? Now there are ony two left. The info on "SqlobjectCaching" seems still worth preserving. Please port it and mark it as not verified. "simple_toolman_drag" is obsolete, IMHO, you can move it to the list at the bottom of the page. Please don't hesitate to change page titles, if it seems appropriate to you. The remaining obsolete docs should now be checked on trac, whether the have a note at the top that they are outdated. If not, please give me a shout and I will add one. If this is finished, we can close the task "Port docs from trac" and should put a note on the page saying so. We then should compile a list of docs that need to be verified somewhere. > I was going to go add "Not verified for 1.0" to the docs I just > ported. It looks like you already looked them over and modified. > Should I assume then that they are verified now since you didn't add > the "not verified" tag yourself? Some of them. I made sure now that I addd appropriate tags to all docs you ported. >I was confused on whether the > source was being moved away from Trac as well. Your answer implies > not. Yes, that's correct. Trac is still, and will be for the forseeable future, our central project server. Chris --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Docs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-docs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
