On 3/14/06, Michele Cella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yep, my idea is different but now I've another idea that's even more > easier and less obtrusive, we just need to signal what's the form > that's been validated and put that into for example > cherrypy.request.validated_form, now when a form or field wants to read > c.p.input_values or c.p.validation_errors it just checks that it's name > is the same as the validated form (or better the instance is the same) > otherwise it should not use those values, no need of a fqf form and > everyone is happy. ;-)
Yes, this makes sense... just keep track of what was validated against and use that when displaying errors. That's a lot more pleasant than fully qualifying names. Kevin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
