Simon Belak wrote: > I agree, we should reuse update_dict, however I still think it needs to > be a part of every TG instance, not just my super-duper-hot-rod-custom. ;) >
Mmm, I expressed myself in the wrong way!! :D What I was intending is that you as the "controllers.py/decorator guru" can do that (in TG not your hot-rod version :D) by using recursive_update and updating the method default dict (if present) with the one coming from input_values, that's all it takes. If you do that please do you think is also worth supporting the same case for lists (now that we have repeating widgets)? you should update every element of the default list (if present) that's a dict by updating it with the same method. Sorry for the confusion!! :D Ciao Michele --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
