On 3/21/06, fumanchu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think you made the right choice. Food for thought from the Zope > world: > > "The key difference between the ConfigParser approach (as I envision > it) and the approach taken by ZCML and ZConfig, is that, with > ConfigParser, applications call the configuration system to pull data, > whereas, with ZConfig and ZCML, the configuration system calls the > application. I think that having the configuration system call > application code has worked fairly well for ZCML. I don't think it has > worked well for ZConfig."
Luckily, the TurboGears config has never gone the route of config calling application code. Other than splitting the file into two files (which is a definite plus), the changes along the way have been failry minor syntactic changes... Still, interesting read from the Zope folks. Thanks for the link! Kevin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
