Kevin Dangoor wrote: > Matt Kruse, author of the calendar we were talking about a couple days > ago, responded to my request for license clarification. He's out to > make sure that he doesn't get hit by crazy support problems from > people using old or hacked versions of his code. > > His requests, quoted from his message to me: > > """ > 1. Keep the headers in place so people can find the original source > 2. If you change the source to integrate it or change it, please not that > these > are your changes and NOT part of the original > 3. If users have problems with the script, please support it rather than > directing them to my site, as it is now bundled with your framework which I'm > not familiar with > 4. Try to keep your code in sync with the code on my site, as I occasionally > release new versions to fix bugs, support new browsers, etc. > 5. In releasing my code within your framework, it must NOT be released under > the same license (MIT) as your own, and instead must carry with it my > "special" > limitations. > """ > > We can certainly package these scripts up, and they look good. We > should just do so in separate projects. That'll make it easy to make > the license terms clear and update those packages whenever the > original JavaScript code updates. >
Basically this means using a separated egg? right? like the TinyMCE widget Alberto has done. Ciao Michele --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
