On 4/26/06, Michele Cella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > *All* parameters are listed at params, they are passed at update_params > and they are documented with params_doct. > If we don't put member_widgets in params we will need another attribute > to document them and also a incoherency with update_params since he > also gets attribute listed at member_widgets is somewhat harder to > explain in this way. > > In the second way you list *all* your parameters at params, in > member_widgets you list those params that hold references to other > widgets, they are used by retrieve_javascript/ccs and the schema > generation, params classified as member_widgets are also different > since you can't update them at display time.
As you note: params and member_widgets are different. I don't think there's a need to try to bring them together. Kevin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
