Em Quinta 27 Abril 2006 22:53, Kevin Dangoor escreveu: > On 4/27/06, Simon Belak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm going to make everyone's life miserable again. ;) > > > > In r1279 I added support for "alternative" decorator syntax as used by > > PEAK to lessen the anguish of people still on Python 2.3. This > > unfortunately requires a bit different application of decorator() > > function. > > This change needs to be in a5. I don't want to do another alpha > release, and I don't want to see this wait until 1.1. Do we have any > other code that is impacted that needs changing? Is there any way to > provide backwards compatibility?
I am trying to make old code work with this... I'm sending another message describing my problems. Maybe I had wrong code before -- it worked perfectly before, though -- and now I have it fixed, but... -- Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
