Jorge Godoy wrote: > Em Sexta 28 Abril 2006 17:26, Kevin Dangoor escreveu: >> On 4/28/06, Simon Belak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Kevin Dangoor wrote: >>>>> I intend to make some changes to not burden people who do not need 2.3 >>>>> compatibility (see Jorge's example) and than merge with a5. >>> Commited into 1.0 branch as 1290. >> I tried a quick test of it. Looks good! > > And works with "legacy" decorators ;-) One just has to > > from turbogears.decorator import simple_decorator as decorator > > and he can keep using the old syntax. > > Simon did a great job with this compatibility layer! Really good!
Just to clarify, simple_decorator and family are not intended solely for backward compatibility, my main motivation was reducing boilerplate and not have the user adjust to the framework but vice versa. Cheers, Simon --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
