Em Quarta 03 Maio 2006 12:01, Max Ischenko escreveu:
>
> I doubt this is a definite answer. The definite answer would be to fix
> SQLObject.

Indeed, but if we can prevent things from getting there in a broken state, it 
is better for us.

-- 
Jorge Godoy      <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TurboGears Trunk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to