On 5/9/06, Alberto Valverde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know, I meant to say that this module categorization should be done
> automatically by the browser, I'm not sure this point made it
> through... This means that:
> Scriptaculous would get it's own page, TinyMCE would too, all the
> form widgets in another, MrWacko's Marvelous Widgets another, so
> on... All pages indexed by a TOC as suggested by Michele.

Ahh... Splitting them out by module makes a certain amount of sense.
That would also eliminate potential conflicts in JavaScripts
(particularly if each widget was a separate "page", ie a separate
request).

> Another option could be to add a 'category' metadata parameter to
> widgets so authors could categorize them a là cheesehop... I'm not
> too sure on this one though.

Yeah, that was the one that I thought would get hairy. It makes  a
certain amount of sense, though.

If we get the pagination decorator working, then that's a nice, simple
solution to start with and then we can see what kinds of complaints
people have when they really start using it.

> EvalException is already pretty to my taste... :D

Maybe there's something wrong with the fonts on my system or something :)

Kevin

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TurboGears Trunk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to