On 11/27/06, jerf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Kevin Dangoor wrote: > > On Nov 22, 2006, at 10:19 AM, Jorge Vargas wrote: > > > > > > > > there have been some talk on the list about improving the buildin > > > testing framework maybe even create a "browser" object that will > > > behave as a real client, I came across this on my browsing, maybe it > > > could be helpful for this task > > > > > > http://www.jerf.org/programming/nonMockObjects.html > > > > That description wasn't enough to make me think that we need it (or > > how it would be integrated, per se). > > > > It might be quite productive to integrate twill, however. > > > > Kevin > > As the author, I'd say that NonMockObjects would be completely > unhelpful in creating an automated browser object. > > Where it would come in handy is in creating test content to *feed* an > automated browser, which is actually how I'm using it. (Albeit in > Django, using their in-process client in SVN.)
Actually this is what I was refering too there at least 2 suggestions of a browser object posted here on the list. > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
