On 11/30/06, Kevin Dangoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The new item for the list is: > > 6) Break out more of our code > > #6 is very important. After 0.8, TurboGears grew quite a bit of code and > features for 0.9. It made sense at the time to put them all in the > turbogears package, because the whole point of those features was to build > on services that TG provides. However, I think there's really much greater > value to us and the Python community as a whole if we make *as much > functionality as possible* available as separate pieces with the minimum > required dependencies to do their jobs well. It'll make it easier to > experiment with new features in certain areas, too. >
I think this is very true. Also I think this will serve nicely for TurboGears from marketing POV giving it a solid place in users' mind which is important when you have Django or Pylons or web.py as 'competitors'. ... > To reiterate: I'm looking for people to take control of things like i18n, > Catwalk, FastData, Identity, etc. (BTW, we do need to figure out what to do > with Identity in general, since we have an alternative model that's been put > forth...) > Looks like I have missed something. What is the alternative for Identity? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
