Kevin Dangoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > MochiKit 1.4 (with either the Scriptaculous port or Karl's newer Animator > library) seems to do just about everything the others (proto+Scriptaculous, > jQuery, moo) do. jQuery has the CSS selector thing, but if it's truly useful > I'd imagine that Bob would consider a patch to add it to MochiKit.
There was an implementation of that on the MochiKit mailing list. > MochiKit's bigger, if you're using an all-in-one MochiKit.js, but MochiKit's > also modular if you want to use it that way. It is hard to use it modularly with our current implementation... If we need it our widgets will call the packed version... If we start splitting things as needed for widgets then we might end up loading things twice... Looking at this, a small library would be more interesting, but if we have to search around for everything that we have with MochiKit (its DOM manipulation is simply great!) then it will be a great loss. Be seeing you, -- Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
