On 1/12/07, Joseph Tate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Jorge Vargas wrote: > > or it was just the fact that genshi currently doesn't has a <?python?> > > The fact that the widget would have to be instantiated and returned in > the controller (blurring the line between view and controller). I can > instantiate widgets in kid templates, which conforms to MVC. Imagine a > case where you use the same method for html and json. That widget > would not marshal very well by simplejson. > > That's the paradigm that I have to have in my application. Almost > every method could be called via GET/POST, JSONRPC or XMLRPC, so the > default paradigm should not be changed so that you have to return > something not-marshalable by json/xmlrpc in order to use significant > features. I see your point and in this case it makes sense. But as stated above genshi will have a <?python?> in 0.4 which seems to be their mayor feature. http://genshi.edgewall.org/milestone/0.4
> > Joseph > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
