On 2/1/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > First, we should decide a way to 'list available quickstart templates' > for future version > #1073: No way to discover available quickstart templates > > Actually we could use paste command to list all paste templates > > # paster create --list-templates > Available templates: > basic_package: A basic setuptools-enabled package > paste_deploy: A web application deployed through paste.deploy > tgbase: tg base template > tgbig: For more complex projects > tgwidget: TurboGears widget projects > turbogears: web framework > > 'turbogears'(kid-based) template is the default for quickstart > template. > > Is it ok to point out the usage in doc, or implemented as a wrapper > around that as jorge.vargas suggestion in trac? > > I prefer the prior one as we discussed about the nosetests wrapper. > > > > > - I could wrap the genshi-default template as an optional choices. > > > > That's a good compromise. 1.1 could start offering better Genshi > > integration and optional choices (like --future is doing now) and > > mention that to use widgets in genshi page templates it's best to > > switch to TW. > > > > Second, I've wraped the genshi-default template as an optional > extension, the usage is with the command: > > $ tg-admin quickstart [-t tggenshi] [project name] > > To make current tg templates looks more meaningful, I'd like to change > the default (kid-based) quickstart template name as 'tgkid' instead of > 'turbogears'. > > .... > tgkid: web framework with kid > tggenshi: web framework with genshi
I have already done this. http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk/browse_thread/thread/c52de71231cf03f1/6ddfebb34b6b509a?lnk=gst&q=quickstart&rnum=10#6ddfebb34b6b509a but got no reply back then so it was something to be done post1.0 here is the dirrect link http://docs.turbogears.org/1.0/RoughDocs/quickstartInternals Third, should we separate all quickstart templates as extensions? I don't think so at much it should be one package with all the templates. Forth, if we think so, what is the preferable way to organize the > increasing projects in trac? > > > -- > Fred > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
