While I don't have an intimate understanding of the work being done, I can't help but get excited by this sentiment.
I've been such a huge fan of this framework and push it for every project I work on, but I definitely want to be using Genshi and SQLAlchemy right now. Kuffs and I have been moving through as many of the 1.0.2 bugs as we can figure out to try and push things forward, but have been bummed to find that a lot of tickets that haven't been touched in a month or already have patches that haven't been applied yet. Kuffs and I are happy to triage bugs, write tests, write documentation, whatever. We need a little guidance, but we're both smart and useful guys that want to TurboGears to reach more of it's potential. Regarding the branching: I don't think that anyone should be running a production application from trunk, and I agree that three branches in sync is probably too much. But I have to say that for all new projects, TurboGears as is of little value. No one wants to start a project that they are going to maintain for any significant period when they know that the fundamental blocks of the framework are going to change in the near future. The current status is like a big sign that says "Don't use me, I'm not ready." Let's start a bee-line development target for something everyone will want to use. That definitely means Genshi and SQLAlchemy (that's 1.1, right?) and it probably means CP3 too. If the trunk goes crazy unstable, the 1.0 branch is still there for current projects. -- Travis Bradshaw --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
