Alberto Valverde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sounds reasonable, mind anyone opening a "patched" ticket at the > Trac? :)
I've been thinking... What about making tg.request (cherrypy.request) available? There we'd have all information from the request and we could modify it there... Of course, a complement of turbogears.request would also be nice. AND, since we're going towards WSGI, we can make that an entry_point or a configuration parameter... By default this would be cherrypy.request, but it could be any request object. What do you think? -- Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
