Alberto Valverde wrote: > Hmm, that's weird. I've tried importing "dispatch" and didn't > complaint. Do you have a traceback so we can see where the problem > comes from? I susect it has something to do with the namespace > packakes peak uses. > > I would really like not to include PEAK as another TG dependency > since it's pretty big, we don't use it and some of its functionallity > overlaps with what we have (peak.web, peak.database, etc...)
I also installed RuleDispatch last week without PEAK and it didn't complain. But Florent is right, RuleDispatch imports peak.util.decorators in two places. This code is probably only executed under certain conditions. I think we should check with Phillip Eby whether this is really necessary; if it is, it should be also added to "install_requires" which currently lists only PyProtocols. -- Chris --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
