On Mon, 2007-12-11 at 01:40 +0100, Christopher Arndt wrote: > Christoph Zwerschke schrieb: > > Mark Ramm wrote: > >> 2.3 support also adds a lot of work for the release team in TG 1.x, > >> which is 100% waste of valuable developer time if people don't really > >> need 2.3 any more. > >> > >> What are the thoughts from the rest of tg community? > > +1 for dropping 2.3 support in TG 1.1. TG 1.0.x will go into maintenance > mode soon anyway, from the look of things, so it should be easy to keep > 2.3 support there. > > > I think we should move to 2.4 in TG 1.1 and to 2.5 in TG 2.0. > > Woawoahwoah, easy with the horses. Why drop 2.4 support? What does 2.5 > have that's so crucial to TG that we absolutely need it?
Also, the Ubuntu LTS packages do *not* include python 2.5 right now correct? I think that would be a bit much too. I think a lot of people are deploying on ubuntu for this kind of stuff. Iain --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
