> from maco website: > Mako: 1.10 ms Myghty: 4.52 ms > Cheetah:1.10 ms Genshi: 11.46 ms > Django: 2.74 ms Kid: 14.54 ms > > That was the only reference I found. So if mako and cheetah are at the > same speed and we support cheetah then cheetah would be my first > choice if I wanted speed I think. Unless there are other reasons. I > couldn't find any other compressions of the two do.
Well, Mako is pure python, and that cheetah score is with C speedups. And Mako provides template composition, caching, and other tools that Cheetah does not. No matter what we do, we won't drop cheetah support, but I have not had the same number of people pushing me to use Cheetah in TG2 as I have Mako. And Pylons defaults to Mako, not cheetah, so if we are going to be different I want it to be for good reasons, and I just don't think Cheetah has enough advantages over Mako to be worth that. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
