Yeah, WebOb is awesome. Makes simple testing a breeze, too. FYI, I'm still running 2.4 on my Win32 dev machine if you needs testers for anything specific. I'm sticking with 2.4 mostly because of this issue (which I guess is kind of perverse). I haven't had much luck with tracing the errors up the stack either, though I'm not nearly as familiar with Pylons internals as some others on this list.
Kevin Horn On Jan 23, 2008 10:41 PM, Mark Ramm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 23, 2008 11:36 PM, Kevin Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Are those 2.4 issues the ones related to WebOb exceptions, or are there > > others as well? > > Same ones. Pylons trunk is failing lots of tests at the moment if > you are on 2.4, and I haven't been able to find a clean way to fix the > error going up the stack. I have a couple of ideas that we're > kicking around, but it's looking like it will take longer than > expected. But it will be worth it in the end! Shiny WebOb goodness > will make middleware lots easier to write, and will make for good > standard Request and Response objects that aren't framework dependent. > > --Mark > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
