I updated the page to be more current with what is happening with SA, and I also added in DBSprockets and Elixir.
http://docs.turbogears.org/1.0/SQLObjectVsSQLAlchemy Now, here is the question I would like to pose: Given that there is no longer any true benefits to SO (with the exception of Model Designer (I'm working on it!)), WHY DON'T WE SWITCH TO SA for the default template on 1.1?????? -chris On Feb 7, 4:55 pm, percious <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Man, This site is so SO-oriented. > > "SA is earlier in it's development cycle, so interfaces are still in > flux and > bugs crop up. For example, the current Active Record frontend is > slated for > replacement by its author and MS SQL Server support is buggy in the > current > (0.3.1) release. > " > > On Feb 7, 4:47 pm, percious <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hey guys. > > > I am updating this page:http://docs.turbogears.org/1.0/SQLObjectVsSQLAlchemy > > which outlines the benefits and drawbacks of SA vs. SO. > > > SO, which of the following are still known to work in TG1? > > > CatWalk, ModelDesigner, FastData > > > I know catwalk is still working, but horribly buggy. > > > What about the other two? > > > -chris --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
