Mark Ramm wrote: > The fact that TurboGears turns incoming request prams into > controller function params seems intuitive and smart to me. But > there are some limitations: > > * Function params must have asci string names > * Function params can have only one value
I actually think the first problem is irrelevant. As Diez suggests later, this can be controlled by the developer, and I believe that if the developer really needs non-ascii parameter names, they can just take in `**params` rather than explicitly defining them in the method. The second problem is a genuine issue, and one that bit me just today. I think that we should solve this at a higher level, and parameters that have multiple values should just come through as a list of the values. I am working around this right now by using `request.params` and it works fine for me for the time being. -- Jonathan LaCour http://cleverdevil.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
