> nope, what ChrisP wants is to be able to protect a full controller > without being forced to used a decorator on each exposed method. > This is something that is still needed.
I think I have a sample of something that could work for this somewhere, I'll try to post it up somewhere (or just add it to tgrepozewho) in the next couple of days. --Mark Ramm --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
