>> So far we are 100% free to write opensource and commercial code. >> >> So far we are not required to recognize that we are using a specific >> framework >> (and believe me, it is easier to add a new thing to some environments when >> absolutely nothing changes visually from what was there before, specially >> to >> big corporations). >> >> I see this addition as a drawback to using TG and my vote is -1 to >> anything >> that makes this a concern. > > -1 on this. Default tg quickstart and tools should be 100% BSD/MIT > whatever that does not require the final product to do anything > special. > If we include some thing in the default template or tools people may > use it without understanding the real requirement. And then problems > will pop-up with lawers and we'll have people complaining around that > we did not warn them (even if we did). > > Please avoid such things at all costs. If you want to use this tools, > then create a plugin and make sure you can easy_install it. Then > default TG2 installs will be safe. > > I (like Jorge) work in an environment were getting authorization to > use some tool is put under scrutiny by an army of lawers and non-tech > people who will pick any excuse to refuse your techno and impose some > "standard choice" (ASP .NET) > > I want to be 100% on the safe side and make sure those people won't > have an easy excuse like this one to refuse tg2.
Makes sense, I'm with you guys on this one. Cheers, Daniel -- Psss, psss, put it down! - http://www.cafepress.com/putitdown --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
