Patrick Lewis schrieb: > Not saying that a stronger hash is a bad thing, but that the existing > implementation is still pretty good for its intended purpose.
That's what I was trying to say. Also, the attack on SHA1 seems to be considerably more computing-intensive, so I think with these two factors put together it is still safe to recommended storing passwords a SHA1 hashes. Chris --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
