> I'm not saying that I object to this solution, it's backwards > compatible, and it's easy to do. But I don't know that it's actually > the best we can do in terms of providing a sane user interface.
In fact, I think that we should just do things in the most backwards compatible way that we can for the sake of expediency, and because it's proved not to be too problematic for users. But I think I will add a config option so that those who don't want automatic conversion into lists can skip it. (A config option which will necessitate using validators, or using a @as_list() decorator.) --Mark Ramm --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
