On 8/27/08, Christoph Zwerschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Christopher Arndt wrote: > > IMHO, only fixes of type 5 & 7 and maybe 6 should go into 1.0.X > > maintenance releases. The distinction between 5 & 6 and 8 would have to > > be decided on a case-by-case basis, depending on the criticality of the > bug. > > > > What do others think on this? > > > Fully agree. Not sure about the monthly/quarterly release schedule for > 1.0. I think we should release only as and when required, i.e. after a > critical fix or when a couple of fixes have accumulates. Otherwise > people may feel compelled to upgrade their productive instances, though > nothing substantial has changed. For 1.1 however, a monthly release will > be good.
Ok. Let's try that: 1.1 beta1 is released tonight and we push hard to have a stable TurboGears "Plissken" 1.1 out. Then we focus on 1.5 and push 1.5 in beta mode as soon as 1.1 stable is out. _Then_ we do monthly releases for 1.5 and add new features to that branch only. Florent. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
