I think it's OK to use the trac wiki this way, since what he's doing is basically elaborating a plan to finish a ticket, and all the actual doc links point to rough docs in the "real" docs wiki.
I think process documents in trac make sense, because they can link to changesets, and tickets very easily, but IMHO the line should be drawn at end-user documentation, which ought go in the docs wiki (or in tg2 into sphinx). On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 2:50 AM, Florent Aide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 10:37 PM, Doug Latornell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I've sketched up what I have in mind for an app testing documentation >> page and corresponding examples in the quickstart app at >> http://trac.turbogears.org/wiki/TG2AppTesting#PlanforTG2AppTestingDocumentationExamples > > You should ask the doc team to gain an access to our wiki instead of > using the trac wiki. Trac wiki has not been used in 2 years now. > > Florent. > > > > -- Mark Ramm-Christensen email: mark at compoundthinking dot com blog: www.compoundthinking.com/blog --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
