On Wednesday September 10, 2008 19:32:25 Lee McFadden wrote: > I like the idea of this as it will give a lot of customization options > in terms of authentication for advanced users while remaining tucked > away for 90% of use cases.
Exactly. It would only be modified by those who need something more advanced. I also agree that it should not be a problem for those who don't need to modify it. Actually, it'd make it easier for those who want something different (not necessarily more advanced; the developer may want to use plain Htpasswd for authentication, and Htgroup with permissions being stored in INI files for authorization, which I consider less complex than using a database for everything). -- Gustavo Narea. http://gustavonarea.net/ Get rid of unethical constraints! Switch to Freedomware: http://softwareliberty.com/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
