On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 2:31 PM, iain duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> For the developer, clearly having A) is more important.
>
> My thought too.
> But, those id tags would be totally optional. The framework rules would
> be working off selectors like so:
>
> /* fixed width column stretching to parent in the y */
> .region.fixed-x.stretched-y { }
> .region.fixed-x.stretched-y .container { }
> I'm also *very* interested in Deliverance. I'll certainly be trying to
> integrate the system with that. I like the idea of a Deliverance/WSGI
> based theming app/framework that can be stuck over mixed
> TG/Pylons/Plone/Django/Drupal frankensites. So keeping IDs clear may be
> important in that regard. I wonder whether I should make the framework
> classes use some kind of namespace tag prefix to keep options open? I
> guess that could be an optional download or something you run a script
> to achieve? Crap, then I need a name! ;-)
Deliverance does seem like a great option for theming, and it seems to
be becoming more and more popular. I'm excited by the fact that the
next version of deliverance will allow you to use either xpath
expressions or css style selectors to pick out the content pieces for
theming. Using css selectors and pure html+css themes makes life
nice for designers.
--Mark Ramm
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TurboGears Trunk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
