On Saturday November 22, 2008 15:41:20 you wrote: > I don't fully understand that. Are you saying that the require-property of > a class is already respected for *all* controllers? If yes - sure, then > there is no need for a SecureController.
Yes, apparently, although it doesn't seem to work correctly; I couldn't spot the problem after a quick look, so tomorrow I'll dive into the code to check what's going wrong. -- Gustavo Narea <http://gustavonarea.net/>. Get rid of unethical constraints! Get freedomware: http://www.getgnulinux.org/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
