On Saturday November 22, 2008 17:46:07 Jorge Vargas wrote: > > I don't fully understand that. Are you saying that the require-property > > of a class is already respected for *all* controllers? If yes - sure, > > then there is no need for a SecureController. > > Also what will happen to non-auth controller like the home page?
If I understood the code well, it will also be able to take advantage of the "require" attribute. -- Gustavo Narea <http://gustavonarea.net/>. Get rid of unethical constraints! Get freedomware: http://www.getgnulinux.org/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
