>> I read your post now, several times: >> I know, that every answer, I can give now, to such a long, well >> thought mail, >> can't really give it the appreciation, it deserves. >> >> Basically, I think that you have some valid points. >> In particular, I think, TW is great, but not the way to write >> a rich client application. >> >> But if you need something for that, is it really a TurboGears >> problem: TG can be used excellently as server side component of a rich >> client app. >> The widget problem for this kind application: isn't it solved better >> by JS widget libraries like dojo's Dijit? >> http://dojotoolkit.org/book/dojo-book-0-9/part-2-dijit-0 >> > My thoughts exactly.
Right. I for one don't use TW at all any more, every client side GUI component is handled by ExtJS and I'm sending the GUI definition stuff in JSON from the server, i.e. the whole GUI is "dynamical". The html only has a couple of lines of <div>'s and that's it. I actually think this is the way of the future for rich client side applications. Cheers, Daniel -- Psss, psss, put it down! - http://www.cafepress.com/putitdown --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
