Yea, we won't want to "drop" dotted name support any time soon even if we do decide to go the other route, but we might want to deprecate it at some point.
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Florent Aide <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 8:20 PM, Mark Ramm <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I'm not totally sure why search paths wouldn't work for extensions >> like pages. You have to use actual paths, but it's very easy to >> overide the template of an extension by putting something higher up >> the list of paths to check (like in your app code). I've used this >> in a couple projects where we had re-usable chunks and it worked out >> well. But I'd believe that there's something I'm missing, just not >> sure what it is yet ;) > > Well, I also think of tg1 --> tg2 migration. TG1 users have dotted > names all around the place. Just a question of migration path really. > I'm sure we can desing something that drops dotted names support > altogether... we just need to decide what we want. > > If we go the non dotted path way we at least need to document this and > tell people about the migration way. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
