On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Florent Aide<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 8:37 PM, percious <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I for one would like 2.1 out as soon as practical.  I think the
>> component architecture can wait until 2.2.  I feel that the 2.1
>> codebase is very well tested and definitely stable enough for an alpha
>> release, so let's get 'er done!
>
> Guys,
>
> I am in favor of a regular release cycle with small changes in each,
> so that we can document the changes and the upgrade path, so I would
> say: "Let's prepare 2.1 release and make sure all works properly... if
> so then release it at the end of next week"
>
> But we should also take care to have some pypi release one day or
> another because only tg1 is installable from the pypi ATM.
>
YES! I have been bitching about this for ages, all we need is the .egg
in there!

As for tg2.1 features I'll like to include a TG1 identity-like layer
on top of r.w*

> Florent.
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TurboGears Trunk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to