:) I'm new to TM and that's why I thought that it could be a good thing to support both versions. But since you say there is no need to do that, then I'm good :).
Thanks, Alex On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Jorge Vargas <[email protected]>wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Felix Schwarz<[email protected]> > wrote: > > Alexandru Marinescu schrieb: > >> > >> Since we are on this. > >> I would like to provide support for both turbomail 2 and turbomail 3. > And > >> since there are differences in both configuration and API, is there a > way > >> of > >> getting the version of the installed turbomail package? > > > > You could use setuptools or just check for example if the message has a > send > > method (which it hasn't in TurboMail 2). > > > > Just let me know what you need so I can provide it (though I think > TurboMail > > 3 is so much better and so compatible that I ask people to use TurboMail > 3 > > if possible). > > > +1 I really don't see the point in having TM2 compatibility. > > > fs > > > > > > > > -- Alexandru Marinescu --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
