i'll give it a try on my local for osesturkiye.com. what are the steps i should follow?
* i've created a virtualenv --no-site-packages * git clone the pylonesless branch * ran bin/python setup.py develop * in my app i ran ../bin/paster setup.py develop and got an error for tg.devtools so i went and downloaded and did a setup.py for it. i've not noticed any performance increasements and it seems the current branch seems faster but not that much. i did not have any problems with my tg app. everything is working. On Dec 12, 11:22 am, Alessandro Molina <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 1:17 AM, Christoph Zwerschke <[email protected]> wrote: > > Am 12.12.2011 00:20, schrieb Alessandro Molina: > > >> Now pylons-less branch passes all the tests both with and without > >> pylons installed and is now a bit faster than the pylons based branch. > > > Congratulations! This is really a big step forward. > > > Did you run some real-life TG apps with that branch? Unfortunately, our test > > suite is not very comprehensive, so we should test this with some of our > > apps and add more unit tests if we notice any problems. Hope I can find some > > time over the holidays for giving this a try. > > Not really, I have a fake app I use to develop that practically ended > up being a test suite as it uses every single tgext that I wrote and > they seem to work. > But it doesn't test for example session, i18n and configuration. > Yes, I still don't know if it cares about the config options, the > config object was quite pervert (wrapper of a wrapper of a > DispatchingConfig used as a StackedProxy) and I'm afraid that I might > have broke something. > > I'll be really glad to anyone that has a few hours to invest testing > the pylons-less branch on any applications that he has available. > Just keep in mind that it is based on TG2.1.4 so the application > itself has to be compatible with TG2.1.4 > > Even pylons based controllers should work, just check that > tg.pylons_compatible is True. > Disabling it makes the app go faster at the price of not being > compatible with Pylons related Controllers (XMLRPCController for > example) > > My current target for the branch is to achieve 100% code coverage on > the TG module. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en.
