I still have to look how crank integrates in TG, but it should be
framework independent it shouldn't be an issue.

As I worked hard at optimizing the pylons-less branch in the last
week, using profiler middleware and a set of some benchmark testing tg
applications,  I have been able to push the performances from
~800req/sec up to ~1700req/sec on my machine (most simple app without
templating on gevent,  genshi quickstart app on paste got from 58r/s
to 77r/s) some of the changes I did apply to the dispatching and so
should probably be ported to crank in the case we switch to it.

On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 5:45 AM, Michael Pedersen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Here's a question to consider in this discussion:
>
> Alessandro has put together a branch that removes Pylons as a requirement.
> What happens if we go forward with that branch? How does it affect Crank?
> Are the two of them compatible, or will we have to make a choice between
> them?
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 5:15 PM, percious <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> To bring the discussion back to crank, and relate to what Chris said.
>>
>> Crank actually allows us to move over to pyramid without maintaining
>> multiple codebases if we decide to do that.  I realize we are spinning off
>> one of the major parts of TG, but I think in this case it makes sense.  This
>> was a big problem with TG1.0, 1.5 and 2.0, all of which have separate
>> codebases to maintain for dispatch.
>>
>> I agree that TG should remain as a first-class citizen with Crank, and
>> that backwards compatibility should be maintained.  I have done everything
>> in my power to make sure that the existing 2.1.x tests work with crank in
>> the codebase.
>>
>> As a side note, I'm writing something to remove the repoze.w* mess, and I
>> plan on spinning off the part of the code that selects templates/template
>> engines into it's own package, or partnering with Alice of web.core to
>> utilize alacarte, which is a replacement for buffet.  I'm tired of
>> maintaining multiple dotted template lookup code too ;-)
>>
>> cheers.
>> -chris
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "TurboGears Trunk" group.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/turbogears-trunk/-/7F_CCpa9aZgJ.
>>
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Michael J. Pedersen
> My Online Resume: http://www.icelus.org/ -- Google+ http://plus.ly/pedersen
> Google Talk: [email protected] -- Twitter: pedersentg
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "TurboGears Trunk" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TurboGears Trunk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en.

Reply via email to