Seems fair, it's a piece of code which is not documented, with little or no use (users), stuff like this can become cruft later.
+1 I'm all for it too. Carlos Daniel Ruvalcaba Valenzuela On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 1:57 PM, percious <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 from me. > > cheers. > -chris > > > On Monday, November 19, 2012 2:32:48 PM UTC-7, [email protected] wrote: >> >> I would like to remove the postpone_commits decorator in the upcoming >> major release, so I'm writing here to get any feedback :D >> >> The main reason is that it's not documented and it's the only decorator >> left depending on the decorators package. >> I suppose not many people are using it, and people who are, probably >> understand what's happening and should be able to reimplement it by >> themselves in a bunch of lines of code. >> >> I'm working at achieving 100% code coverage, so I'm checking all the >> modules for what might look like unused code, and postpone_commits seems a >> good candidate for removal. >> >> >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TurboGears Trunk" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/turbogears-trunk/-/80jBTbfB2jUJ. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en.
