+1 to that. On Apr 19, 11:11 am, Alessandro Molina <alessandro.mol...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Christoph Zwerschke <c...@online.de> wrote: > > Am 19.04.2013 03:46, schrieb Michael Pedersen: > > > Does anybody have issues with this? Is it a bad idea, or one whose > >> time has come? What do you all think? > > > The docs repository is an order of magnitude larger, and if docs would > > really be maintained as desirable, they would be even larger. So it makes > > some sense that they are separate. Makes cloning and searching in the code > > repositories much faster. I'm fine with the separate repositories, and if > > documented properly, it's not confusing. > > I see some advantages in merging TurboGears and tg.devtools repositories, > but I agree that the docs should probably be a separate repository. > As I would like to permanently keep the doc on rtfd.org, having the docs > separated wouldn't actually cause any bad to the release management > process. It should be something rtfd takes care of for us.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to turbogears-trunk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to turbogears-trunk@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
