On Oct 3, 2005, at 9:54 AM, Lethalman wrote:

Everyone knows turbogears isn't a stable product yet because it's at
the beginning and its changes are in the core of the program.
So i'm thinking that an user who wants to make his own web application
and get a look for turbogears, he sees that it's stable and launched
because the turbogears version is not a beta or an alpha... then when
releasing the next version the user needs to do a refactoring and i
think it's not good.
Pheraps i suggest to make beta versions of turbogears before releasing
a very stable and non-dynamic core the product.

Hope you understand my text :P

Version numbers less than 1.0 nearly always carry the connotation that you'll have to refactor occasionally on upgrade. "alpha" is implicit. If Kevin thought the API was completely stable I imagine that he'd have called it 1.0 by now.

-bob

Reply via email to