Hi Leo, On 10/6/05, leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was wondering if anyone had any information on using a different ORM > with TG? Any documentation on the OR stuff would be nice...
Here's the "official" stance... TurboGears itself packages up and includes documentation for SQLObject and will likely have an increasing number of capabilities that build on SQLObject's position in the project. But, I have no problem with ensuring that SQLObject is not required for the rest of TurboGears to work. > The reason I ask, is my company is currently developing an in-house ORM > (because of - as always - custom business logic that makes an out of > the box ORM un-ideal) and as such, we can't use SQLObject. TG looks > very nice and promising, but I'd like to know more about the ORM stuff > before considering a pitch to the ones that wear ties. Hopefully the answer above is what you're looking for. In the interest of seeing SQLObject grow to handle as many cases as possible, it would be nice if you could describe the types of things that you've seen that don't work as well in it. It can handle a fair variety of things, from what I've seen. Not everything, but enough to cover a good majority of cases. Kevin
