On 11/1/05, Kevin Dangoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/1/05, dj_ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I find SQLObject very limited and it kind of makes me sad - I'm used to > > using Hibernate. > > There are a few people who previously used Hibernate that are now here > in Python land (myself included). It would probably be productive to > hash out where SQLObject is more limited than Hibernate and see what > kinds of changes could be made to bring SQLObject up to at least the > same level. Python allows us to do more without requiring bytecode > hacks and the like that Hibernate had to resort to, so it hopefully > wouldn't be too much work to fill in those gaps.
I've started a wiki page for discussion/commertary/doc gathering on this: http://trac.turbogears.org/turbogears/wiki/HibernateVsSqlObject Kevin
