On 2005-11-01 21:43:52 -0500, Jeff Watkins wrote: > Since we're left to implement it ourselves, I would suggest making an > explicit join object: > > Person -> Call -> PhoneNumber
honestly, this sounds like a *better* approach than some kind of mapping join type. in my mind, if a many-to-many relationship has additional fields on it, it's no longer a relationship and becomes an entity in its own right. i would argue that adding a Join type with additional fields to SQLObject would be a misfeature. SQLObject isn't preventing you from normalizing your database. -- anders pearson : http://www.columbia.edu/~anders/ C C N M T L : http://www.ccnmtl.columbia.edu/ weblog : http://thraxil.org/
pgpa7tjxDkpRl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
