On Thursday 03 November 2005 9:01 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I would say, don't suggest the -D option as if it is safe. It may
> interfere with existing packaging system.
>
> Better suggest a non-root installation and if that is not wanted, the
> -D option and take whatever consequence that may result.

Ideally, if an equivalent package is already installed, it should just be used 
and not replaced.  I guess this is what  --ignore-conflicts-at-my-risk does?  
The message is not clear to me.

Reply via email to