Don Hopkins wrote: > The new version of SQLObject now has a similar but undocumented feature > that I don’t quite understand, with the _extra_vars Field instance > variable, so I may be able to clean up my code and use that, instead of > wrapping everything with my own subclasses. > > > > Ian, how did you intend _extra_vars to be used: is it meant to hang user > data off of fields, or am I subverting its true goal in life (remaining > secret and behind the scenes in an undisclosed location)? > > The Join classes would also need to support _extra_vars as well.
It is meant to hang data user off of it; I could add it to the other objects as well, and probably a __getattr__ as well. The reason they are specially collected is so that the values can also be transfered to the SO* version of the classes. -- Ian Bicking | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://blog.ianbicking.org
